|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Set-off - 1992 ISDA Provision|The]] {{1992isda}} does not have a specific set off provision, although it manages to define {{isda92prov|Set-off}} anyway.
| | {{isda 6(f) comp|isda92prov}} |
| | |
| [[ISDA]] published a suggested [[set-off]] provision in the [[Users Guide]] but no-one liked it, and several bespoke versions developed and percolated around the market. These often provided for the inclusion of '''{{isdaprov|Affiliate}}s''' in relation to the {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} or {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}.
| |
| | |
| {{icds}} got the hint and implemented a fully-fledged set-off provision based on this language into the {{2002ma}} — but not without a little boo-boo. You can read all about it, and the boo-boo, and what people have done to fix it, at our article about that Section {{isdaprov|6(f)}} {{isdaprov|Set-off}} provision.
| |