|
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{jc:embedded template tester}} | | {{isda 13 comp|isdaprov}} |
| Largely the same, in practical effect, between the two versions: the clause grants the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the governing law you have chosen: you can launch proceedings wherever you like, but you can’t complain if they are launched in a home court, which leaves open that you ''might'' complain if they are launched in some other, inconvenient, court.
| |
| | |
| No doubt a litigation lawyer would be outraged at this suggestion that the versions mean different things, but life’s too short.
| |
| | |
| 2002 version of {{icds}} were properly phoning it in on this one. There are some changes, but none of them mean anything.
| |