|
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{ISDAnumberingdiscrepancy}} - Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(viii)}} is {{isdaprov|Merger Without Assumption}}. | | {{ISDAnumberingdiscrepancy}}{{isda 5(b)(v) comp|isdaprov}} |
| | |
| ==={{1992ma}} upgrade===
| |
| Even before the {{2002ma}} was published it was common to upgrade the {{1992ma}} formulation to something resembling the glorious concoction that became Section {{isdaprov|5(b)(v)}} of the {{2002ma}}. The 1992 wording is a bit lame, really. See the panel below right for a snapshot of the difference
| |
| | |
| On the other hand, you could count the number of times an {{isdama}} is closed out on account of {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} on the fingers of one hand, even if you had lost all the fingers on that hand to an industrial accident. So — yeah.
| |