Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 9(h): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''There is no strict equivalent in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br>
''There is no strict equivalent in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br>


Friends of the [[JC]] will know that half-arsed isn’t always bad, of course — usually is quite good, in fact, as it leaves something to the imagination and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies — and in any case, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details leads you directly into the “{{isia}}” file.  
Friends of the [[JC]] will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always ''bad'', of course — it can be quite ''good'', in fact, characterising as it does the sum total of the [[JC]] ’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case it leaves something to the ''imagination'' and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies.  


Sorry yet? Well, you did ask.
Besides, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details leads you directly into the “{{isia}}” file.
 
Are you sorry yet? Well, you ''did'' ask.


{{ISDA 2002 Section 9 TOC}}
{{ISDA 2002 Section 9 TOC}}