Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 9(h): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''There is no strict equivalent to Section {{isdaprov|9(h)}} in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br>
''There is no strict equivalent to Section {{isdaprov|9(h)}} in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br>


Friends of the [[JC]] will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always ''bad'', of course — it can be quite ''good'', in fact, characterising as it does the sum total of the [[JC]] ’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case it leaves something to the ''imagination'' and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies.
Friends of the [[JC]] will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always ''bad'', of course — it can be quite ''good'', in fact, characterising as it does the sum total of the [[JC]]’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case it leaves something to the ''imagination'' and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies every now and then, don’t we?


Besides, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details leads you directly into the “{{isia}}” file.  
Besides, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details leads you directly into the “{{isia}}” file.