82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''There is no strict equivalent to Section {{isdaprov|9(h)}} in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br> | ''There is no strict equivalent to Section {{isdaprov|9(h)}} in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br> | ||
Friends of the [[JC]] will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always ''bad'', of course — it can be quite ''good'', in fact, characterising as it does the sum total of the [[JC]] ’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case it leaves something to the ''imagination'' and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies | Friends of the [[JC]] will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always ''bad'', of course — it can be quite ''good'', in fact, characterising as it does the sum total of the [[JC]]’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case it leaves something to the ''imagination'' and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies every now and then, don’t we? | ||
Besides, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details leads you directly into the “{{isia}}” file. | Besides, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details leads you directly into the “{{isia}}” file. |