82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the {{vmcsa}}. I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it someh...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the {{vmcsa}}. I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found self-confidence, and eschewed the elegant “the {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transactions}} specified in Paragraph {{vmcsaprov|11}}” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant {{imcsdprov|Covered Transactions (IM)}} specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph {{imcsdprov|13}}”. | [[1(c) - IM CSD Provision|This]] is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the {{vmcsa}}. I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found self-confidence, and eschewed the elegant “the {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transactions}} specified in Paragraph {{vmcsaprov|11}}” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant {{imcsdprov|Covered Transactions (IM)}} specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph {{imcsdprov|13}}”. | ||
Why do you do this to your reading public,. {{icds}}? | Why do you do this to your reading public,. {{icds}}? |