|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Settlement Disruption - Emissions Annex Provision|If]] you harbour a paranoid suspicion that {{icds}} functions as a kind of militant wing of the international brotherhood of law societies, with an overarching mission of preserving the livelihood of qualified lawyers with colossal [[boredom]] thresholds, this drafting will do nothing to allay it.
| | {{emissions comparison|{{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}|{{efetaprov|Force Majeure}}|{{ietaprov|Force Majeure}}}} |
|
| |
|
| We hear it told that [[the ’squad]] run regular internal assault course drills where inductees are woken up at dawn, made to run around a parade-ground in their underpants at the point of a bayonet rendering simple concepts into multi-paragraph byzantine tracts as they go, and this is the product of one such institutional hazing session.
| | {{emissions force majeure overview|euaprov}} |
| | |
| {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption}} and {{euaprov|Suspension}} beg for comparison, so [[Settlement Disruption and Suspension - Emissions Annex Provision|here]] is one: {{compare|65842|65840}} them. See also our laborious, but probably wasted effort, of a table parsing when, and when not, to apply them: | |
| {{imageflex|name=Disruption Venn|extension=png|47|frame=frameless|align=center|caption=|size=47}}
| |