82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sure, it is preliminary, preamble stuff, but this goes to the core of what is so ''structurally'' different — economically, they’re meant to be as near as dammit the same — about the {{pgmsla}} when compared with the {{gmsla}}. The {{ | Sure, it is preliminary, preamble stuff, but this goes to the core of what is so ''structurally'' different — economically, they’re meant to be as near as dammit the same — about the {{pgmsla}} when compared with the {{gmsla}}. The {{gmsla}} is a two-way [[title transfer]] agreement, where [[credit risk]] mitigation functions by [[Set-off|offset]], leaving the person who has transferred the greater value of assets (usually, ironically, the {{gmraprov|Borrower}}) with residual credit exposure, for the difference, to the one who has transferred the lesser value — usually the {{gmslaprov|Lender}}, as it will insist on being over-collateralised by way of [[initial margin]]. | ||
The | The {{pgmsla}}, by contrast, is a conventional secured “{{gmslaprov|Loan}}” where the {{pgmslaprov|Lender}} has [[credit exposure]] to the {{pgmslaprov|Borrower}} for the ''total'' value of the {{pgmslaprov|Loaned Securities}}, but this is collateralised by a [[pledge]] over {{pgmslaprov|Collateral}} to which the {{pgmslaprov|Borrower}} retains legal title. | ||
{{pgmsla nominee capsule}} |