Template:M gen Equity Derivatives 12.8: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "===Negotiation tips=== If you have the privilege or representing a dealer, prepare to experience one of the great ol...")
 
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
Secondly, the disputability of derivative valuations, generally, falls into two camps: one one hand, those of liquid, publicly observable asset classes — such as those in the [[spot FX]] and listed equities markets — whose valuations derive from objectively-reported, independent market transactions and there isn’t really a great deal of scope for debate and, on the other, those that asset classes that comprise exotic, bespoke, “bull-''market''”<ref>This is one of those occasions where “bull-market” and “bull shit” are exact synonyms.</ref> transactions, which spring from the fevered imagination of credit [[structurer]]s and depend on fantastical internal models of convexity curves, volatility smiles and other such exotic confections. These, no-one but the mad professor who confected them could calculate, much less want to, and for absolute certain the person ''employing'' said mad professor — the [[dealer]] — would not dream of allowing anyone else to second guess those calculation because upon them is predicated the very, colossal, PNL on which the trade is predicated.
Secondly, the disputability of derivative valuations, generally, falls into two camps: one one hand, those of liquid, publicly observable asset classes — such as those in the [[spot FX]] and listed equities markets — whose valuations derive from objectively-reported, independent market transactions and there isn’t really a great deal of scope for debate and, on the other, those that asset classes that comprise exotic, bespoke, “bull-''market''”<ref>This is one of those occasions where “bull-market” and “bull shit” are exact synonyms.</ref> transactions, which spring from the fevered imagination of credit [[structurer]]s and depend on fantastical internal models of convexity curves, volatility smiles and other such exotic confections. These, no-one but the mad professor who confected them could calculate, much less want to, and for absolute certain the person ''employing'' said mad professor — the [[dealer]] — would not dream of allowing anyone else to second guess those calculation because upon them is predicated the very, colossal, PNL on which the trade is predicated.


Anyway, I digress. Suffice to say equity derivatives belongs to the ''former'' category. It is an access product: the dealer provides exposure without taking a naked proprietary position one way or another. It hedges [[delta-one]], so and is remunerated by means of (i) a [[commission]] for putting the trade on and taking it off, and (ii) managing the spread between the financing cost it charges and the net funding cost of its hedging activity.
Anyway, I digress. Suffice to say [[equity derivatives]] belong to the ''former'' category. They are an access product: the dealer provides exposure without taking a naked proprietary position one way or another. It hedges [[delta-one]], so and is remunerated by means of (i) a [[commission]] for putting the trade on and taking it off, and (ii) managing the spread between the financing cost it charges and the net funding cost of its hedging activity. (For a full account, see ''[[prime brokerage charging]]''). Equity derivatives [[dealer]]s do not take a proprietary position.
 
They broadly determine the prices of your swap exactly as they would for cash equity brokerage: by buying or selling shares, only for its hedge, not for your account. Just as you wouldn't get a dispute right on cash brokerage trade — good luck saying, “yeah, I have another broker telling me it could have got a better price” to a stock broker —nor, really should you on a synthetic. The whole theory of the game is that it is a liquid market and the dealer has better access to that market than you do. If you can get better prices elsewhere, ''go'' elsewhere.