Template:M intro casenote Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc

Revision as of 16:40, 12 June 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A fine example of that old legal {{t|maxim}} ''anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt'': Little old ladies (and, in this case, aggrieved Welsh hotel owners) make bad law, {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}} ([https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2014/1156.html&query=(title:(+greenclose+)) judgment]) opines on the apparently harmless {{isda92prov|Notices}} Section ({{isda92prov|12}}) of the {{1992ma}}. It considers the me...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

A fine example of that old legal maxim anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt: Little old ladies (and, in this case, aggrieved Welsh hotel owners) make bad law, Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc (judgment) opines on the apparently harmless Notices Section (12) of the 1992 ISDA. It considers the meaning of “electronic messaging system” and, saucily, finds that it does not include email.

Let me say that again, in case you missed it: in the eyes of the current common law email does not count as an “electronic messaging system.