82,891
edits
Template:M intro design System redundancy: Difference between revisions
Template:M intro design System redundancy (view source)
Revision as of 17:21, 1 August 2023
, 1 August 2023→Redundancy as a key to successful change management
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
===Redundancy as a key to successful change management=== | ===Redundancy as a key to successful change management=== | ||
Damon | {{Quote| | ||
Gravity always wins. | |||
: Radiohead, ''Fake Plastic Trees'' (1992)}} | |||
Damon Centola’s research about concentration and bunching of constituents to ensure change is permanent. | |||
[[Complex system]]s seek out their own equilibria. Over time, the autonomous components in the system — people, mostly — settle into habits, ways of working, creating their own networks, dependencies and generally acquiring their own meta theories of what they are there to do and how best to do it (some do this more consciously than others, but all, at some level do it.) These priorities will be personal to the agent, and they may partly coincide with the organisation’s, they won’t entirely — it is no part of a corporation’s plan, above all else, to make sure I stay here, and thrive, and get well paid, while minimising personal risk and responsibility, and these,we submit, motivate most corporate employees more deeply than ensuring immaculate shareholder return. But we digress. | |||
The systems and subsystems evolve ways of working that create their own efficiencies — efficiencies that yield to personal motivations not corporate ones. They wear in grooves, smooth down sharp edges and naturally, through the adaptive process of time, seek out local maxima. We should not be surprised that systems which have found an equilibrium are hard to shift from it | |||
In a fight be between logic and gravity, gravity always wins. | |||
It stands to reason that a single change agent | |||