82,459
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
It is not the customerʼs business. It is ''lawyerʼs ''business''.'' | It is not the customerʼs business. It is ''lawyerʼs ''business''.'' | ||
====Reader feedback ==== | |||
This seems to have struck a chord. With readers. Mr Moorhead recommends Gulati and Scott’s ''Three and a half minute contract'' for similar anecdotes about associates having no idea of the provenance or meaning of apparently vital, inviolate terms has been a feature of JCʼs solitary inhouse crusade. | |||
{{quote | | |||
''Filled with reforming zeal, JC encounters bizzare term in standard form. He enquires of the responsible desk lawyer: | |||
{{script|JC}}: “What does this do?” | |||
{{script|Legal eagle}}: “Donʼt know.” | |||
{{script|JC}}: “What does it even mean?” | |||
{{script|Legal eagle}}: “Donʼt know.” | |||
{{script|JC}}: “Can we take it out?” | |||
{{script|Legal eagle}}: [''horrified''] “Absolutely not. Chip put that in. ” | |||
{{script|JC}}: “Who is Chip?” | |||
{{script|Legal eagle}}: “Donʼt know. Oh hang on. He might have been the GC, I think.” | |||
{{script|JC}}: “When?” | |||
{{script|Legal eagle}}: “He left before the merger [''which happened in 1998''].”}} |