82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
But there is a better objection: for all our automatic protestations to the contrary, the ISDA is not ''really'' a bilateral contract, and it ''is'' often a financing contract, in economic effect even if not in formal structure. Where there is a customer gaining exposure to a risk and a dealer providing delta-hedged exposure to that risk, a swap is a sort of “synthetic loan”. | But there is a better objection: for all our automatic protestations to the contrary, the ISDA is not ''really'' a bilateral contract, and it ''is'' often a financing contract, in economic effect even if not in formal structure. Where there is a customer gaining exposure to a risk and a dealer providing delta-hedged exposure to that risk, a swap is a sort of “synthetic loan”. | ||
This thought grew and grew and now there is a [[ | This thought grew and grew and now there is a [[A swap as a loan|whole new article about it]]. | ||
=== On the case for one-way margin === | === On the case for one-way margin === |