Template:M intro isda Party A and Party B: Difference between revisions

Line 34: Line 34:
But there is a better objection: for all our automatic protestations to the contrary, the ISDA is not ''really'' a bilateral contract, and it ''is'' often a financing contract, in economic effect even if not in formal structure. Where there is a customer gaining exposure to a risk and a dealer providing delta-hedged exposure to that risk, a swap is a sort of “synthetic loan”.
But there is a better objection: for all our automatic protestations to the contrary, the ISDA is not ''really'' a bilateral contract, and it ''is'' often a financing contract, in economic effect even if not in formal structure. Where there is a customer gaining exposure to a risk and a dealer providing delta-hedged exposure to that risk, a swap is a sort of “synthetic loan”.


This thought grew and grew and now there is a [[a swap is a loan|whole new article about it]].
This thought grew and grew and now there is a [[A swap as a loan|whole new article about it]].


=== On the case for one-way margin ===
=== On the case for one-way margin ===