82,792
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
==== The finite game ==== | ==== The finite game ==== | ||
{{Drop|B|y design, LLMs}} learn and reason exclusively from what has gone before. While, yes, [[Alpha Go|AlphaGo]] might have engineered a novel strategy in a [[zero-sum game]], the non-linear infinitude of life that a contract review process is a different kettle of fish. And this is not | {{Drop|B|y design, LLMs}} learn and reason exclusively from what has gone before. While, yes, [[Alpha Go|AlphaGo]] might have engineered a novel strategy in a [[zero-sum game]], the non-linear infinitude of life that a contract review process is a different kettle of fish. And this is not what we want in a sorcerer’s apprentice anyway. | ||
That being the case the perfect LLM would be one that served up an archetypal sample of ''what you already have''. | That being the case, the perfect LLM would be one that served up an archetypal sample of ''what you already have''. | ||
====Evolution, not revolution==== | ====Evolution, not revolution==== |