Template:M intro technology rumours of our demise: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 263: Line 263:
An LLM by contrast is algorithmically compositing synthetic outputs ''against human  text. The text it pattern -matches against needs to be well-formed human language. That is how ChatGPT works its magic. Significantly degrading the corpus that it pattern matches against will progressively degrade the output. This is called “model collapse”, it is an observed effect and believed to be an insoluble problem. LLMs will only work for humans if they’re fed human generated content. A redditor put it more succinctly than I can:
An LLM by contrast is algorithmically compositing synthetic outputs ''against human  text. The text it pattern -matches against needs to be well-formed human language. That is how ChatGPT works its magic. Significantly degrading the corpus that it pattern matches against will progressively degrade the output. This is called “model collapse”, it is an observed effect and believed to be an insoluble problem. LLMs will only work for humans if they’re fed human generated content. A redditor put it more succinctly than I can:
{{Quote|{{AlphaGo v LLM}}}}
{{Quote|{{AlphaGo v LLM}}}}
====The ChatGPT canon====


And there is an final contributor to every cultural artefact we haven’t yet considered. The main one: the ''reader''. It is the reader, and her “[[cultural baggage]]”, who must make head and tail of art and literature and who  determines whether it stands or falls. This is true however rich the cultural milieu that supports the art.  
And there is an final contributor to every cultural artefact we haven’t yet considered. The main one: the ''reader''. It is the reader, and her “[[cultural baggage]]”, who must make head and tail of art and literature and who  determines whether it stands or falls. This is true however rich the cultural milieu that supports the art.