Template:M summ 1992 ISDA Force Majeure Event: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "===Section {{isdaprov|5(b)(ii)}} in the {{1992ma}}=== There is no equivalent to the {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} in the {{1992ma}}. An {{isda92prov|Impossibility}} clause...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
*Consider the impact re a deferral of {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} etc.  
*Consider the impact re a deferral of {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} etc.  
The concept also impacts the basis of [[Close Out]] because the {{2002ma}} requires use of true mids for valuation i.e, not the mean of each party's view of the bid/offer where a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} (or {{isdaprov|Illegality}}) occurs, which is effectively what you get under the {{1992ma}} with a “Two {{isdaprov|Affected Parties}}” option.
The concept also impacts the basis of [[Close Out]] because the {{2002ma}} requires use of true mids for valuation i.e, not the mean of each party's view of the bid/offer where a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} (or {{isdaprov|Illegality}}) occurs, which is effectively what you get under the {{1992ma}} with a “Two {{isdaprov|Affected Parties}}” option.
Note a few caveats with regard to Force Majeure Events:
*'''{{isdaprov|Hierarchy of Events}}''': {{ISDA Hierarchy of Events}}
*'''{{isdaprov|Deferral of Payments and Deliveries During Waiting Period}}''':  {{ISDA Deferral of Payments and Deliveries}}
==={{isdaprov|Waiting Period}}===
{{ISDA Waiting Period}}