82,893
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "We are going to go out on a limb here and say that little parenthetical “(including an agreement with respect thereto)” is, if not deliberately ''designed'' that way, is a...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We are going to go out on a limb here and say that little parenthetical “(including an agreement with respect thereto)” is, if not deliberately ''designed'' that way, is at least ''[[calculated]]''<ref>In the sense of being “likely”.</ref> to capture the {{isda92prov|Credit Support Annex}} which, yes, is a Transaction under an {{isdama}} but no, is not really a swap or anything really like one. There is enough chat about Credit support Providers (yes, yes, the counterparty itself is of course not a Credit support Provider) to make us think, on a [[fair, large and liberal]] interpretation, that a default under the [[CSA]] to a swap {{isda92prov|Transaction}} is meant to be covered. | [[Specified Transaction - 1992 ISDA Provision|We]] are going to go out on a limb here and say that little parenthetical “(including an agreement with respect thereto)” is, if not deliberately ''designed'' that way, is at least ''[[calculated]]''<ref>In the sense of being “likely”.</ref> to capture the {{isda92prov|Credit Support Annex}} which, yes, is a Transaction under an {{isdama}} but no, is not really a swap or anything really like one. There is enough chat about Credit support Providers (yes, yes, the counterparty itself is of course not a Credit support Provider) to make us think, on a [[fair, large and liberal]] interpretation, that a default under the [[CSA]] to a swap {{isda92prov|Transaction}} is meant to be covered. |