Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 2(c)

Revision as of 17:32, 18 February 2020 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===I mean, what is the point?=== Our chief contrarian wonders what on earth the point of this section is, since settlement netting is a factual operat...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I mean, what is the point?

Our chief contrarian wonders what on earth the point of this section is, since settlement netting is a factual operational process for performing existing legal obligations, rather than any kind of variation of the parties’ rights and obligations. If you owe me ten pounds and I owe you ten pounds, and we agree to both keep our tenners, what cause of action arises? What loss is there? We have settled our existing obligations in different way.

To be sure, if I pay you your tenner and you don’t pay me mine, that’s a different story — but then there is no settlement netting at all. The only time one would wish to enforce settlement netting it must, ipso facto, have actually happened, so what do you think you’re going to court to enforce?

So, friends, this rather convoluted passage in that mighty industry standard is, as G. K. Chesterton once said - merely piss and wind.