|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| An observant [[negotiator]] (is there any other kind?) handling a {{1992ma}} might wish to add a new agency rep as Section {{isda92prov|3(a)(vi)}}. In 2002, {{icds}} obviously thought this was such a good idea that they added a brand-new “no-agency” rep to the {{2002ma}}, only they can’t have felt it was basic enough to go in the {{isdaprov|Basic Representations}}, so they put it in a new clause all by itself at Section {{isdaprov|3(g)}}.
| | {{isda 3(a) summ|isdaprov}} |
| | |
| But you don’t need a bespoke no-agency rep if you’re on a {{2002ma}}, if that’s what you’re wondering.
| |