|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{isdacomparison}} | | {{isda 5(b)(i) summ|isdaprov}} |
| | |
| ==={{isdaprov|Illegality}} vs. {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}} smackdown===
| |
| Like a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}}, an {{isdaprov|Illegality}} may only be triggered after exhausting the fallbacks and remedies specified in the {{2002ma}}.
| |
| | |
| ==={{isdaprov|Hierarchy of Events}}===
| |
| Under the {{2002ma}}, Section {{isdaprov|5(c)}} (''{{isdaprov|Hierarchy of Events}}'') intervenes to provide that (i) {{isdaprov|Illegality}} trumps {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}} and (ii) {{isdaprov|Illegality}} and {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}} both trump the {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}} and {{isdaprov|Breach of Agreement}} {{isdaprov|Events of Default}}. Given that {{isdaprov|Illegality}} is no longer subject to the "two {{isdaprov|Affected Parties}}" delay on termination (as it was in the {{1992ma}}), this is significant.
| |