Template:M summ 2002 ISDA Close-out Amount: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Note the prominent requirement to achieve a “''[[reasonable]]''” ({{1992ma}}) or “[[commercially reasonable|''commercially'' reasonable]]” ({{2002ma}}) result. On what that latter lovely expression means see {{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}}.  Spoiler: it’s basically good for [[broker|brokers]] as long as they aren’t [[Non mentula esse|being total dicks]].
Note the prominent requirement to achieve a “''[[reasonable]]''” ({{1992ma}}) or “[[commercially reasonable|''commercially'' reasonable]]” ({{2002ma}}) result. On what that latter lovely expression means see {{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}}.  Spoiler: it’s basically good for [[broker|brokers]] as long as they aren’t [[Non mentula esse|being total dicks]].
There are some local variations which are worth bearing in mind:
==={{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} and Italian counterparties===
See for more detail, here: [[Close-out Amount - ISDA Provision/Italian counterparties|Italian counterparties]]
===Releationship with Early Termination Amount===
For those curious about {{isdaprov|the difference between the Early Termination Amount and the Close-out Amount}} in the {{2002ma}}, look no further than back there, along the sentence you've just read. Go on.