Template:M summ 2002 ISDA Specified Indebtedness: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "A simple and innocuous enough provision. Almost redundant — why go to the trouble of defining borrowed money as another term? (Answer: because some firms, in their wisdo...")
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
What of a failure to pay [[initial margin]]? Technicallty this is not the IM payer’s indebtedness — indeed when paid, it is the IM receiver’s indebtedness to the IM payer — so while it certainly comprises a failure to pay when due, the value of the {{isdaprov|Specified Indebtedness}} that failure contributes to the {{isdaprov|Threshold Amount}} might be nil, or even ''negative''.
What of a failure to pay [[initial margin]]? Technicallty this is not the IM payer’s indebtedness — indeed when paid, it is the IM receiver’s indebtedness to the IM payer — so while it certainly comprises a failure to pay when due, the value of the {{isdaprov|Specified Indebtedness}} that failure contributes to the {{isdaprov|Threshold Amount}} might be nil, or even ''negative''.


see also the somewhat clumsier (but materially similar) definition of {{efetprov|Specified Indebtedness}} in the {{efetma}}.
See also the clumsier (but materially similar) definition of {{efetprov|Specified Indebtedness}}in the {{efetma}}.
{{sa}}
*{{isdaprov|Cross Default}} ({{isdama}})
*[[cross default]] (generally)
 
{{ref}}