82,892
edits
Template:M summ 2002 ISDA Unpaid Amounts: Difference between revisions
Template:M summ 2002 ISDA Unpaid Amounts (view source)
Revision as of 11:06, 23 June 2023
, 23 June 2023no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "You may want to know where {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}} feature in the {{isdama}}. The answer: In {{isdaprov|Payments on Early Termination}}: Section {{isdaprov|6(e)(i)}} (for...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Unpaid Amount - ISDA Provision|If]] you think of an ISDA {{isdaprov|Transaction}} as comprising offsetting payment streams, these payments fall into one of three [[ontological]] categories: | |||
*'''Been and gone''': Those that are already paid: settled, gone, checked into the hereafter; on permanent location in that foreign country we call the past — we care less about these; they are but a fossil record: they pose no risk, attract no capital and excite no prospects of revenue or compensation. | |||
*'''Yet to come''': Due to be paid, or delivered, at a specified date in the future. Perhaps fixed; perhaps yet to be determined, but conceptually still out there. It is, conventionally, by off setting the provisional present value of these future cashflows, that we value “the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}” — this is what we call its “[[Replacement Transaction - ISDA Provision|replacement cost]]”. | |||
*'''The twilight zone''': That weird inter-regnum of payments whose due date has passed, and which ''should have'' have been paid, and thus emigrated permanently to that foreign country but, for whatever reason — inattention, inability, defiance, or the affordances of Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} — they have not yet been made, so they need to be worried about, accounted for and factored into things, over and above the “replacement” value of the trade. | |||