82,882
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If that were not bamboozling enough, how about this [[for the avoidance of doubt]] [[incluso]] which does nothing ''but'' introduce doubt into a clause already wracked with enough confusion and bitterness for your average bear: | If that were not bamboozling enough, how about this [[for the avoidance of doubt]] [[incluso]] which does nothing ''but'' introduce doubt into a clause already wracked with enough confusion and bitterness for your average bear: | ||
{{quote|[[For the avoidance of doubt]], in order to determine the amounts “[[applicable]] to the [[Chargor]]” for the purposes hereof, the parties will take into account the effect of any [[conditions precedent]] applicable to such amounts.}} | {{quote|“[[For the avoidance of doubt]], in order to determine the amounts “[[applicable]] to the [[Chargor]]” for the purposes hereof, the parties will take into account the effect of any [[conditions precedent]] applicable to such amounts.”}} | ||
My best guess is that this means, “where payment of [[independent amount]] depends on something happening, then you only count it if that something has happened.” Like, you don’t say, fellas. | My best guess is that this means, “where payment of [[independent amount]] depends on something happening, then you only count it if that something has happened.” Like, you don’t say, fellas. |