Template:M summ 2018 CSD Other CSA: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


In any case, prime brokers: you need to designate the prime brokerage agreement as an {{imcsdprov|Other CSA}}. Even though it isn’t a CSA.
In any case, prime brokers: you need to designate the prime brokerage agreement as an {{imcsdprov|Other CSA}}. Even though it isn’t a CSA.
Why did {{icds}} include the throw-away comment about the {{imcsdprov|Control Agreement}}, which isn’t itself a collateral arrangement at all, not being an {{imcsdprov|Other CSA}} at the end, when it clearly isn’t and no-one said it was in the first place? Who knows? Who ''cares''?
... Except that it ''would'' be fun to specifically designate a {{imcsdprov|Control Agreement}} as a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} just to see what happened. I mean why you ''would'', I don’t know, other than just to set off the smoke alarms in your [[dealer]]’s [[legal department]] — but come to think of it, that’s reason enough. You have to make your fun where you can get it, friends.