Template:M summ Credit Derivatives 4.2: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "Differences with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(vii): *Doesn’t cover credit support providers (being an ISDA concept, not hugely relevant...")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
[[4.2 - Credit Derivatives Provision|Differences]] with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(vii):
[[4.2 - Credit Derivatives Provision|Differences]] with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(vii)}}:
*Doesn’t cover [[credit support provider]]s (being an ISDA concept, not hugely relevant to debt securities) or {{cddprov|guarantor}}s (but that is converted elsewhere, directly).
*Doesn’t cover [[credit support provider]]s (being an ISDA concept, not hugely relevant to debt securities) or {{cddprov|guarantor}}s (but that is converted elsewhere, directly).
*Simplified provision (d) which is less bothered about who institutes the proceedings, and less particular about the types of formal insolvency process one can go through, so is a bit more “[[fair large and liberal]]”.
*Simplified provision (d) which is less bothered about who institutes the proceedings, and less particular about the types of formal insolvency process one can go through, so is a bit more “[[fair large and liberal]]”.
*No catch-all “analogous proceedings” rider at the end to sweep up weirdo jurisdictions.
*No catch-all “analogous proceedings” rider at the end to sweep up weirdo jurisdictions.