82,896
edits
Template:M summ EUA Annex (d)(i)(2): Difference between revisions
Template:M summ EUA Annex (d)(i)(2) (view source)
Revision as of 10:05, 12 September 2023
, 12 September 2023no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
So: | So: | ||
:(A) you have to comply with the {{euaprov|Scheme}}, and deliver from your {{euaprov|Holding Account}} to the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}}’s. (Quite why it matters ''whence'' the {{euaprov|Allowances}} come we cannot say — a vague fretfulness about theft perhaps? — but ok; let’s run with it. The transfer is done once the {{euaprov|Allowances}} hit the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}}’s account (I know, I know: ''you don’t say''.) | :(A) you have to comply with the {{euaprov|Scheme}}, and deliver from your {{euaprov|Holding Account}} to the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}}’s. (Quite why it matters ''whence'' the {{euaprov|Allowances}} come we cannot say — a vague fretfulness about theft perhaps? — but ok; let’s run with it. The transfer is done once the {{euaprov|Allowances}} hit the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}}’s account (I know, I know: ''you don’t say''.) Interesting use of the word “whereupon”, upon, er which we dwell in a bit more detail in the premium section. | ||
:(B) We’ll talk about (B) in the premium section. | :(B) We’ll talk about (B) in the premium section. | ||
:(C) If the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}} has designated multiple {{euaprov|Specified Holding Account}}s — as to ''why'' it would ''have'' multiple accounts, let alone specify them for a single {{euaprov|Transaction}} we can provide no answer beyond basic bloody-minded perversity — but let’s just say — Delivering Party starts at the top and, if for some reason the first-named accounts are subject to some kind of disruption and the later ones are not — again, search us what might cause that — work its way down until it has delivered all EUAs. (If it gets to the bottom unfulfilled, see {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} and {{euaprov|Suspension Event}}). | :(C) If the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}} has designated multiple {{euaprov|Specified Holding Account}}s — as to ''why'' it would ''have'' multiple accounts, let alone specify them for a single {{euaprov|Transaction}} we can provide no answer beyond basic bloody-minded perversity — but let’s just say — Delivering Party starts at the top and, if for some reason the first-named accounts are subject to some kind of disruption and the later ones are not — again, search us what might cause that — work its way down until it has delivered all EUAs. (If it gets to the bottom unfulfilled, see {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} and {{euaprov|Suspension Event}}). | ||