Template:M summ EUA Annex (d)(i)(2): Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Template:M summ EUA Annex (d)(i)(2) (view source)

Revision as of 08:54, 14 September 2023

4 bytes removed , 14 September 2023

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,892

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[(d)(i)(2) - Emissions Annex Provision|All]] tediously quotidian, largely-goes-without-saying stuff, until you stumble over subparagraph (B) like an inattentive trail-runner not noticing a tree-root.
-So:
+So: <br>
-:(A) {{Emissions transfer of allowances summ|euaprov}}
+(A)
-:(B) We’ll talk about (B) in the premium section.
+{{Emissions transfer of allowances summ|euaprov}}
-:(C) If the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}} has designated multiple {{euaprov|Specified Holding Account}}s — as to ''why'' it would ''have'' multiple accounts, let alone specify them for a single {{euaprov|Transaction}} we can provide no answer beyond basic bloody-minded perversity — but let’s just say — Delivering Party starts at the top and, if for some reason the first-named accounts are subject to some kind of disruption and the later ones are not — again, search us what might cause that — work its way down until it has delivered all EUAs. (If it gets to the bottom unfulfilled, see {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} and {{euaprov|Suspension Event}}).
-:(D) If you deliver outside the normal window during business hours, your delivery is deemed satisfied at the next moment where a window on business hours opens. Workaday stuff that will be familiar with anyone who deals with the settlement of securities for a living.
-But (B)? That’s weird. For more discussion on that, and a compare and contrast with the corresponding IETA provision, see our [[pjc:Delivery - EUA Provision|premium version]].
+(B) <br>
+We’ll talk about (B) in the {{premium}} section. <br>
+(C) <br>
+If the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}} has designated multiple {{euaprov|Specified Holding Account}}s — as to ''why'' it would ''have'' multiple accounts, let alone specify them for a single {{euaprov|Transaction}} we can provide no answer beyond basic bloody-minded perversity — but let’s just say — Delivering Party starts at the top and, if for some reason the first-named accounts are subject to some kind of disruption and the later ones are not — again, search us what might cause that — work its way down until it has delivered all EUAs. (If it gets to the bottom unfulfilled, see {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} and {{euaprov|Suspension Event}}). <br>
+(D) <br>
+If you deliver outside the normal window during business hours, your delivery is deemed satisfied at the next moment where a window on business hours opens. Workaday stuff that will be familiar with anyone who deals with the settlement of securities for a living.
+But (B)? That’s weird. For more discussion on that, and a compare and contrast with the corresponding IETA provision, see the {{premium}}.