|
|
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Settlement Disruption - Emissions Annex Provision|Oft]] mentioned in a similar breath to a {{euaprov|Suspension Event}} and a {{euaprov|Failure to Deliver}}, a Settlement Disruption Event is one of the external events which leads to a suspension of obligations, pending the lifting of the disruption, that are set out in the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption}} provisions of Paragraph {{euaprov|(d)(i)(4)}} of the {{emissionsannex}}.
| | {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption}} and {{euaprov|Suspension}} beg for comparison, so [[Settlement Disruption and Suspension - Emissions Annex Provision|here]] is one: {{compare|65842|65840}} them. See also our laborious, but probably wasted effort, of a table parsing when, and when not, to apply them: |
| ===For the avoidance of doubt, this is intended to avoid doubt===
| | {{imageflex|name=Disruption Venn|extension=png|47|frame=frameless|align=center|caption=|size=47}} |
| There is a wonderful [[nested uncertainty avoidance device]] buried in the redundant second paragraph, which effectively says, [[for the avoidance of doubt]], this [[For the avoidance of doubt|avoidance of doubt]] paragraph is intended to avoid doubt, and not actually change anything. Here [[Ourobos]] reaches around and eats its own tail: a clause which appears to do something — for why else in a competently-composed passage would it be there? — appears to be there simply to deny its own ''raison d’etre''.
| | ===Traumnovelle=== |
| | | {{Emissions force majeure termination summ|euaprov}} |
| The odd thing is, however that the passage does not ''avoid'' doubt so much as create it, for what ''is''
| |
| :“... the low or non-allocation of {{euaprov|Allowances}} by a {{euaprov|Member State}} or ... the delay or failure of a Member State or Central Administrator to replace Allowances of the {{euaprov|Third Compliance Period}} with {{euaprov|Allowances}} for the {{euaprov|Fourth Compliance Period}}...”
| |
| if not “an event or circumstance beyond the control of the party affected that cannot, after the use of [[all reasonable efforts]], be overcome and which makes it impossible for that party to perform its obligations”?
| |
| | |
| Why should that not be a {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption}}?
| |
| ===Settlement Disruption and Suspension=== | |
| {{Suspension v Settlement Disruption}} | |
| | |
| {{M summ EUA Annex (d)(i)(4)(D)}}
| |