82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There: that saved you a bit of bafflement. | There: that saved you a bit of bafflement. | ||
That being the case you might wonder why {{icds}} saw fit to write them out separately, eschewing the option for a cheeky as the case may be — but their chosen architecture, treating {{eqderivprov|Merger Event}}s and {{eqderivprov|Tender Offer}}s separately, forces them into this leaden exposition. We have some tedious thoughts on the unwisdom of this in our [[Semantic structure - drafting principles|drafting principles]] section, if you are interested. | That being the case you might wonder why {{icds}} saw fit to write them out separately, eschewing the option for a cheeky “[[as the case may be]]” — but their chosen architecture, treating {{eqderivprov|Merger Event}}s and {{eqderivprov|Tender Offer}}s separately, forces them into this leaden exposition. We have some tedious thoughts on the unwisdom of this in our [[Semantic structure - drafting principles|drafting principles]] section, if you are interested. |