Template:M summ GMSLA 2.4: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "At first blush it looks like a typographical gremlin where someone pasted "prices, sums or values" into the clause twice, but no, this is what {{islacds}} actyually meabnt to...")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
At first blush it looks like a typographical gremlin where someone pasted "prices, sums or values" into the clause twice, but no, this is what {{islacds}} actyually meabnt to say when crafting this clause. A comma might have been handy — but it is a bit late for that now. But this is really, really wooden drafting:
At first blush it looks like a typographical gremlin where someone pasted “prices, sums or values” into the clause twice, but no: on closer examination we think this is what {{islacds}} ''actually meant to write'' when drafting this clause. A comma might have been handy — but it is a bit late for that now. But this is really, really wooden drafting:


:'' for the purposes of determining any prices, sums or values (including Market Value and Required Collateral Value)'''{{font colour|red|,}}''' prices, sums or values stated in currencies other than the Base Currency shall be converted into the Base Currency ...
:''... [[for the purposes of]] determining any prices, sums or values (including {{gmslaprov|Market Value}} and {{gmslaprov|Required Collateral Value}})<big>'''{{font colour|red|,}}'''</big> prices, sums or values stated in currencies other than the {{gmslaprov|Base Currency}} shall be converted into the {{gmslaprov|Base Currency}} ...''


Sigh. PICK YOUR BATTLES, JOLLY CONTRARIAN, PICK YOUR BATTLES.
Sigh. PICK YOUR BATTLES, JOLLY CONTRARIAN, PICK YOUR BATTLES. But is it too much for ask for a ''little'' bit of elegance with one’s mother tongue?