82,853
edits
Template:M summ GMSLA 27.4: Difference between revisions
Template:M summ GMSLA 27.4 (view source)
Revision as of 09:26, 16 September 2021
, 16 September 2021no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A simple clean up provision to inherit all existing {{gmslaprov|Loan}}s under {{osla}}s and older {{gmsla}}s. The more pedantic will provide in {{gmslaprov|Schedule 11}} tha...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A simple clean up provision to inherit all existing {{gmslaprov|Loan}}s under {{osla}}s and older {{gmsla}}s. | [[27.4 - GMSLA Provision|A]] simple clean up provision to inherit all existing {{gmslaprov|Loan}}s under {{osla}}s and older {{gmsla}}s. | ||
The more pedantic will provide in {{gmslaprov|Schedule 11}} that those legacy [[stock lending agreement]]s are all deemed terminated, and the super cautious might add, by way of [[For the avoidance of doubt|wholly unnecessary clarification]], that the extant loans are governed by the new agreement as a [[single agreement]] — but ''legally'' this doesn’t go much further than the text of para {{gmslaprov|27.4}}. If your [[netting]] engine is thrown for a loop by the existence of two live [[Master netting agreement|master agreements]] between the same counterparties (hey — it can happen) then formally terminating the superseded one for good order is a sensible step — but this is really an operational point more than a legal one. | The more pedantic will provide in {{gmslaprov|Schedule 11}} that those legacy [[stock lending agreement]]s are all deemed terminated, and the super cautious might add, by way of [[For the avoidance of doubt|wholly unnecessary clarification]], that the extant loans are governed by the new agreement as a [[single agreement]] — but ''legally'' this doesn’t go much further than the text of para {{gmslaprov|27.4}}. If your [[netting]] engine is thrown for a loop by the existence of two live [[Master netting agreement|master agreements]] between the same counterparties (hey — it can happen) then formally terminating the superseded one for good order is a sensible step — but this is really an operational point more than a legal one. | ||
Note also that, unlike an {{isdama}}, a [[GMSLA]] ''can'' be terminated as a separate thing conceptual item, apart from all outstanding {{gmslaprov|transaction}}s under it. | Note also that, unlike an {{isdama}}, a [[GMSLA]] ''can'' be terminated as a separate thing conceptual item, apart from all outstanding {{gmslaprov|transaction}}s under it. | ||