82,853
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''Compare Paragraph {{gmsla2000prov|6.4}} of the {{2000gmsla}}, which (ahem ~spoiler alert~) is materially the same'' There is a tension between {{gmslaprov|6.6}} and {{gmsl...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Compare Paragraph {{gmsla2000prov|6.4}} of the {{2000gmsla}}, which (ahem ~spoiler alert~) is materially the same'' | ''Compare Paragraph {{gmsla2000prov|6.4}} of the {{2000gmsla}}, which (ahem ~spoiler alert~) is materially the same'' | ||
There is a tension between {{gmslaprov|6.6}} and {{gmslaprov|6.7}}: while under {{gmslaprov|6.6}} a {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is not obliged to ''vote'' in a certain way, for a corporate action — even one involving a lender option — the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} may requests the Equivalent securities be returned with the rights taken up. | [[6.7 - GMSLA Provision|There]] is a tension between {{gmslaprov|6.6}} and {{gmslaprov|6.7}}: while under {{gmslaprov|6.6}} a {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is not obliged to ''vote'' in a certain way, for a corporate action — even one involving a lender option — the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} may requests the Equivalent securities be returned with the rights taken up. | ||
Best illustrated by way of example: | Best illustrated by way of example: |