Template:M summ GMSLA 9: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 11: Line 11:
Since prudential requirements to have [[netting opinion]]s do not apply within single transactions, one does not need a mini close-out provision to net within transactions under a GMSLA. That happens as of right. Therefore if, as is often the case, your loan portfolio is all the “same way round” — if you are borrowing from, but never lending to, a lender in a gross jurisdiction, then netting doesn’t really do anything for you. Your problem will be your {{gmslaprov|collateral}} [[haircut]], for which you will be an unsecured creditor of the lender. To fix this, a pledge GMSLA is what you are looking for.  
Since prudential requirements to have [[netting opinion]]s do not apply within single transactions, one does not need a mini close-out provision to net within transactions under a GMSLA. That happens as of right. Therefore if, as is often the case, your loan portfolio is all the “same way round” — if you are borrowing from, but never lending to, a lender in a gross jurisdiction, then netting doesn’t really do anything for you. Your problem will be your {{gmslaprov|collateral}} [[haircut]], for which you will be an unsecured creditor of the lender. To fix this, a pledge GMSLA is what you are looking for.  


 
===Odd spot===
'''Odd spot''': See the peculiar impact [[mini-closeout]] has on {{isdaprov|Default Under Specified Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}.
See the peculiar impact [[mini-closeout]] has on {{isdaprov|Default Under Specified Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}.
 
{{sa}}
*[[GMSLA Netting]]
*[[Pledge GMSLA]]
*{{isdaprov|DUST}}