82,891
edits
Template:M summ OSLA 12: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Note by contrast to the {{isdama}} the {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} is only an {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} upon written notice to the other party: in the {{isdama}} it is a...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note by contrast to the {{isdama}} the {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} is only an {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} upon written notice to the other party: in the {{isdama}} it is an {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} in itself, and it gives rise to a non-defaulting party’s right designate a termination event. | [[12 - OSLA Provision|Note]] by contrast to the {{isdama}} the {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} is only an {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} upon written notice to the other party: in the {{isdama}} it is an {{oslaprov|Event of Default}} in itself, and it gives rise to a non-defaulting party’s right designate a termination event. | ||
A subtle difference but one which calls for a little bit of caution: for example, a party may have failed to pay or deliver: if you want to simply remind the defaulting party to make the payment without inadvertently triggering a termination, you need to be careful about how you do that so as to not trigger! | A subtle difference but one which calls for a little bit of caution: for example, a party may have failed to pay or deliver: if you want to simply remind the defaulting party to make the payment without inadvertently triggering a termination, you need to be careful about how you do that so as to not trigger! | ||