Template:M summ Pledge GMSLA 28.1: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
As well as the general objections to this feebly drafted provision (as to which, see below) we have another one: if the counterparties to this pledge-style agreement are already counterparties to an existing 2010 GMSLA — the one where collateral flows by [[title transfer]] — then glibly asserting that the old agreement has been superseded does not work — the collateral arrangements are utterly different operationally as well as legally — and is not likely to be the parties’ intention.   
[[28.1 - Pledge GMSLA Provision|As]] well as the general objections to this feebly drafted provision (as to which, see below) we have another one: if the counterparties to this pledge-style agreement are already counterparties to an existing 2010 GMSLA — the one where collateral flows by [[title transfer]] — then glibly asserting that the old agreement has been superseded does not work — the collateral arrangements are utterly different operationally as well as legally — and is not likely to be the parties’ intention.   


The Pledge GMSLA exists to cater for the [[agent lending]] universe, where are securities lenders are happy for their collateral to be delivered into a tri party system where it is “dead-ended”, and where are collateral lenders are generally represented by an agent who has entered into a master agency lending agreement.  
The Pledge GMSLA exists to cater for the [[agent lending]] universe, where are securities lenders are happy for their collateral to be delivered into a tri party system where it is “dead-ended”, and where are collateral lenders are generally represented by an agent who has entered into a master agency lending agreement.