Template:Noncontractualobligations: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
If you’ve ever despaired at the pernicketiness of {{tag|governing law}} clauses such as this:—
If you’ve ever despaired at the pernicketiness of {{tag|governing law}} clauses such as this:—


:''This agreement and any [[non-contractual obligation]]s [[arising out of or in connection with it]] shall be governed by and construed [[in accordance with]] {{tag|English law}}.'' <br>
:''This agreement and any [[non-contractual obligation]]s [[arising out of or in connection with it]] shall be [[Governed by and interpreted in accordance with|governed by and construed]] [[in accordance with]] {{tag|English law}}.'' <br>


Then you have the [[Rome II]] {{tag|EU Regulation}}<ref>{{eureg|864|2007|EC}}</ref> to blame. Enacted in 2007, it applies to all {{tag|EU}} Member States<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> and is designed to harmonise the “[[conflict of laws]]” rules across [[Member States]]<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> dealing with with [[non-contractual obligations|non-contractual disputes]].
Then you have the [[Rome II]] {{tag|EU Regulation}}<ref>{{eureg|864|2007|EC}}</ref> to blame. Enacted in 2007, it applies to all {{tag|EU}} Member States<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> and is designed to harmonise the “[[conflict of laws]]” rules across [[Member States]]<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> dealing with with [[non-contractual obligations|non-contractual disputes]].