Template:Options and flawed assets: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "Once paid, you have no further ''obligations'' under the {{euaprov|Transaction}}, just the right — confitional on the option being in the money — to be paid on exercise. T...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Once paid, you have no further ''obligations'' under the {{euaprov|Transaction}}, just the right — confitional on the option being in the money — to be paid on exercise. This can make matters interesting should your [[swap dealer]] decide to play ''[[Um alberne kerle zu spielen]]'' with the [[flawed asset]] provisions in your ISDA — newsflash: it ''won’t'', as long as its risk team retains possession of their deliberative faculties, but that won’t stop the negotiation community obsessing about how to cater for the contingency that they do not. There is a lengthy disquisition about it in the “details” section of our article on Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}}.
Once paid, you have no further ''obligations'' under the {{euaprov|Transaction}}, just the right — confitional on the option being in the money — to be paid on exercise. This can make matters interesting should your [[swap dealer]] decide to play ''[[Um alberne kerle zu spielen]]'' with the [[flawed asset]] provisions in your ISDA — though, newsflash: it ''won’t'', as long as its risk team retains possession of their deliberative faculties but that won’t stop the negotiation community obsessing about how to cater for the contingency that they do not.  
 
For bookish types, there is a lengthy disquisition about it in the “{{plainlink|https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Section_2(a)(iii)_-_ISDA_Provision#Non-payment_delivery_defaults|details}}” section of our article on Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}}.