Template:Options and flawed assets: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Once paid, you have no further ''obligations'' under the {{euaprov|Transaction}}, just the right — confitional on the option being in the money — to be paid on exercise. This can make matters interesting should your [[swap dealer]] decide to play ''[[Um alberne kerle zu spielen]]'' with the [[flawed asset]] provisions in your ISDA — though, newsflash: it ''won’t'', as long as its risk team retains possession of their deliberative faculties — but that won’t stop the negotiation community obsessing about how to cater for the contingency that they do not.  
Once paid, you have no further ''obligations'' under the {{euaprov|Transaction}}, just the right — confitional on the option being in the money — to be paid on exercise. This can make matters interesting should your [[swap dealer]] decide to play ''[[Um alberne kerle zu spielen]]'' with the [[flawed asset]] provisions in your ISDA — though, newsflash: it ''won’t'', as long as its risk team retains possession of their deliberative faculties — but that won’t stop the negotiation community obsessing about how to cater for the contingency that they do not.  


For bookish types, there is a lengthy disquisition about it in the “{{plainlink|https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Section_2(a)(iii)_-_ISDA_Provision#Non-payment_delivery_defaults|details}}” section of our article on Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}}.
<span class="plainlinks">For bookish types, there is a lengthy disquisition about it in the “[https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Section_2(a)(iii)_-_ISDA_Provision#Non-payment_delivery_defaults details]” section of our article on Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}}.</span>