Template:Pronouns on the JC: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
So, without having the patience to be scientific or methodical about it, the [[JC]] has tried to randomise his use of “[[sexist language|him]]s” and “[[sexist language|her]]s” [[unless the context requires otherwise|where the context does not require otherwise]]. (By the way, the [[JC]] himself is a ''him'', and that’s just that.) Being a fellow, when speaking in the abstract about individual randoms, he errs in favour of “she” because that makes him think a bit harder about what he’s writing.  
So, without having the patience to be scientific or methodical about it, the [[JC]] has tried to randomise his use of “[[sexist language|him]]s” and “[[sexist language|her]]s” [[unless the context requires otherwise|where the context does not require otherwise]]. (By the way, the [[JC]] himself is a ''him'', and that’s just that.) Being a fellow, when speaking in the abstract about individual randoms, he errs in favour of “she” because that makes him think a bit harder about what he’s writing.  


The challenge with doing that when writing satire, of course, is that it may be mistaken for some kind of political statement: why is the [[JC]] always mocking ''women''? Be assured, he does not mean to. For whatever the opinion of an aging man is worth these days, it isn’t meant to be. In any case, he can’t be arsed with xes, hyms, hyrs or whatever else is presently in vogue — and nor is that a political statement other than one on behalf of the impatient party — and, frankly, he will go to the wall before (deliberately!) using “they” to describe any single individual, natural or [[Legal personality|corporate]].<ref>Here, he departs from [[Lord Justice Waller]].</ref>  
The challenge with doing that when writing satire, of course, is that it may be mistaken for some kind of political statement: why is the [[JC]] always mocking ''women''? Be assured, he does not mean to. In any case, he can’t be arsed with xes, hyms, hyrs or whatever else is presently in vogue — and nor is that a political statement other than one on behalf of the impatient party — and, frankly, he will go to the wall before (deliberately!) using “they” to describe any single individual, natural or [[Legal personality|corporate]].<ref>Here, he departs from [[Lord Justice Waller]].</ref>  


If this aggrieves you, so be it: you’re welcome to find another resource offering free, satirical observations on the law and practice of derivatives that better suit your preferences. Or you could always bear with it: ''[[Friedrich Nietzsche|Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker]]'', after all.
If this aggrieves you, so be it: you’re welcome to find another resource offering free, satirical observations on the law and practice of derivatives that better suit your preferences. Or you could always bear with it: ''[[Friedrich Nietzsche|Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker]]'', after all.