82,899
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "That we are arcing exponentially upward ''towards'' something, as the adjacent possibilities explode around us<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEtATZePGmg ''The “Adjacent Possible” – and How It Explains Human Innovation''], Stuart Kauffman, TED, </ref> presumes that where we are, presently, as close to “our common end goal” — truth, nirvana, apocalypse? Who knows? — as human civilisation has ever been. Now, seeing as we don...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That we are arcing exponentially upward ''towards'' something, as the [[adjacent possibilities]] explode around us<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEtATZePGmg ''The “Adjacent Possible” – and How It Explains Human Innovation''], [[Stuart Kauffman]], TED, </ref> presumes that | That we are arcing exponentially upward ''towards'' something, as the [[adjacent possibilities]] explode around us<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEtATZePGmg ''The “Adjacent Possible” – and How It Explains Human Innovation''], [[Stuart Kauffman]], TED, </ref> presumes that civilisation is, presently, as close to “the singularity”, whatever that is — [[truth]], [[Utopia|nirvana]], [[apocalypse]]? Who knows? — as it has ever been. | ||
But, seeing as we ''don’t'' know what or where that end state is (if we did, we would already be there, [[Q.E.D.]]), nor therefore can we know how close we are to it, nor whether we are going in the right direction. | |||
A better hypothesis, thanks to [[Occam’s razor]] therefore: there is ''no'' end-goal. We are just humans, being. |