82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===Sovereign immunity and the Cassanova problem=== The fact that (unless agreed otherwise) Sovereign Immunity Act 19...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Now in the architecture of the {{isdama}} this involves writing in the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, something like “Section {{isdaprov|13(d)}} shall not apply to Party A or Party B”. Is this mere silence on the matter, or is it ''an explicit agreement to contract out of it''? | Now in the architecture of the {{isdama}} this involves writing in the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, something like “Section {{isdaprov|13(d)}} shall not apply to Party A or Party B”. Is this mere silence on the matter, or is it ''an explicit agreement to contract out of it''? | ||
Had the {{isdama}} only had the sense to shut up about [[sovereign immunity]] in the first place, there would have been no problem: [[what the eye | Had the {{isdama}} only had the sense to shut up about [[sovereign immunity]] in the first place, there would have been no problem: [[what the eye don’t see the chef gets away with]]. | ||
This will still be the stance you find yourself having to adopt. “I am not agreeing that [[sovereign immunity]] ''applies'',” you will find yourself maintaining to the insistent gaze of your [[credit officer]]. “I am simply ''not'' saying that it ''doesn’t'' apply.” | This will still be the stance you find yourself having to adopt. “I am not agreeing that [[sovereign immunity]] ''applies'',” you will find yourself maintaining to the insistent gaze of your [[credit officer]]. “I am simply ''not'' saying that it ''doesn’t'' apply.” | ||
This falls short of what the [[Sovereign Immunity Act 1978]] requires for [[sovereign immunity]] to kick in. Hold that confident smile until it hurts. | This falls short of what the [[Sovereign Immunity Act 1978]] requires for [[sovereign immunity]] to kick in. Hold that confident smile until it hurts. |