Template:Sovereign immunity in master agreements: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "===Sovereign immunity and the Cassanova problem=== The fact that (unless agreed otherwise) Sovereign Immunity Act 19...")
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
Now in the architecture of the {{isdama}} this involves writing in the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, something like “Section {{isdaprov|13(d)}} shall not apply to Party A or Party B”. Is this  mere silence on the matter, or is it ''an explicit agreement to contract out of it''?  
Now in the architecture of the {{isdama}} this involves writing in the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, something like “Section {{isdaprov|13(d)}} shall not apply to Party A or Party B”. Is this  mere silence on the matter, or is it ''an explicit agreement to contract out of it''?  


Had the {{isdama}} only had the sense to shut up about [[sovereign immunity]] in the first place, there would have been no problem: [[what the eye don't see the chef gets away with]].
Had the {{isdama}} only had the sense to shut up about [[sovereign immunity]] in the first place, there would have been no problem: [[what the eye don’t see the chef gets away with]].


This will still be the stance you find yourself having to adopt. “I am not agreeing that [[sovereign immunity]] ''applies'',” you will find yourself maintaining to the insistent gaze of your [[credit officer]]. “I am simply ''not'' saying that it ''doesn’t'' apply.”
This will still be the stance you find yourself having to adopt. “I am not agreeing that [[sovereign immunity]] ''applies'',” you will find yourself maintaining to the insistent gaze of your [[credit officer]]. “I am simply ''not'' saying that it ''doesn’t'' apply.”


This falls short of what the [[Sovereign Immunity Act 1978]] requires for [[sovereign immunity]] to kick in. Hold that confident smile until it hurts.
This falls short of what the [[Sovereign Immunity Act 1978]] requires for [[sovereign immunity]] to kick in. Hold that confident smile until it hurts.