Template:Waiting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''{{wasteprov|Waiting}} on an internal [[escalation]]''': Eventually the client replies, and it doesn’t like that [[NAV trigger]]. Per policy, you must escalate this to [[Credit]] team. This involves composing and sending an email, then {{wasteprov|waiting}} for [[credit]] to reply.<ref>[[Credit]] will, eventually, be fine with dropping the [[NAV trigger]] — see {{wasteprov|over-processing}}.</ref> That is a 15 sec decision, but it will take 24 hours (on a good day) to achieve. Reduce this wait time (and improve data control) by:  
*'''{{wasteprov|Waiting}} on an internal [[escalation]]''': Eventually the client replies, and it doesn’t like that [[NAV trigger]]. Per policy, you must escalate this to [[Credit]] team. This involves composing and sending an email, then {{wasteprov|waiting}} for [[credit]] to reply.<ref>[[Credit]] will, eventually, be fine with dropping the [[NAV trigger]] — see {{wasteprov|over-processing}}.</ref> That is a 15 sec decision, but it will take 24 hours (on a good day) to achieve. Reduce this wait time (and improve data control) by:  
:'''Standardising terms''' to pre-approve obvious giveaways empowering negotiators to approve common points of contention; '
:'''Standardising terms''' to pre-approve obvious giveaways empowering negotiators to approve common points of contention; '
:''Recalibrating standards''' to reduce the gap between “starting offer” and “walkaway point”;  
:'''Recalibrating standards''' to reduce the gap between “starting offer” and “walkaway point”;  
:'''Standardising the escalation process''' to capture [[metadata]] about variations from the requested terms
:'''Standardising the escalation process''' to capture [[metadata]] about variations from the requested terms


'''Summary''': Most of your negotiation time is dead air. Fix that. <br>
'''Summary''': Most of your negotiation time is dead air. Fix that. <br>