Template:Without limitation and ejusdem generis: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[Without limitation]] and [[ejusdem generis]]===
===Without limitation and [[ejusdem generis]]===
Recently spotted: specifically carving out [[ejusdem generis]] as an articulation of the [[without limitation]] trope:
“Without limitation” is surely tedious enough, but what is a legal eagle’s most sacred mission if is not to make the tedious tediouser? In furtherance of that clause we recently spotted the following in that most saintedly over-vexed of all contracts, an ''[[NDA]]'': a specific [[carve-out]] for application of the [[ejusdem generis]]” rule:
:“including '''([[without limitation]] or application of the [[ejusdem generis]] rule)''' data (including ''[ ... and here follows a long and tedious catalogue of the various forms that data can take concluding with cat memes, GIFs and any and all other information, howsoever described]'', inasmuch and insofar as it relates to the Discloser.”
:“including '''([[without limitation]] or ''application of the [[ejusdem generis]] rule'')''' data (including ''[ ... and here follows a long and tedious catalogue of the various forms that data can take concluding with cat memes, GIFs and any and all other information, howsoever described]'', inasmuch and insofar as it relates to the Discloser.”


This, of all places, in that most saintedly over-vexed of all agreements, a ''[[confidentiality agreement]]''.
This, colleagues, is [[legal eagle]]ry taken to extraordinary, self-contradictory lengths. For what is the purpose of a laundry list of specifics in the first place, if not to somehow craft, contextualise or otherwise put some meaningful boundaries on a vague and indeterminate general expression which you fear might otherwise have impossibly wide application? If all you want is to capture “all information”, just ''say'' “all information”, and be done with it: don’t trouble your counterparty with both a laundry list which [[Q.E.D.]], is ''patently'' redundant ''and'' an [[ejusdem generis]] [[carve-out]], which underscores that fact.
 
This, readers, is [[legal eagle]]ry taken to an extraordinary, self-contradictory lengths. This is the [[legal eagle]] as [[The farmer and the sheep|''farmer'', cack-handedly counting her sheep]]. For what is the purpose of a laundry list of specifics in the first place, if not to somehow craft, contextualise or otherwise put some meaningful boundaries on a vague and indeterminate general expression which you fear might otherwise have impossibly wide application? If all you want is to capture “all information”, just ''say'' “all information”, and be done with it: don’t trouble your counterparty with both a laundry list which [[Q.E.D.]], is ''patently'' redundant ''and'' an [[ejusdem generis]] [[carve-out]], which underscores that fact.