The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves: Difference between revisions

m
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{review|The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves|Brian Arthur|R1R7JT2AG50IFT|7 July 2010|Thoughtful entry on an under-explored topic}}
{{a|book review|}}{{author|Brian Arthur}}’s treatise is a little ponderous but, all the same, is most encouraging in its [[Epistemology|philosophical]] disposition — assuming as it does the “recursivity” of society and technology, rather than holding the (usual) view that one is strictly a product of the other. This is a [[path-dependent]] model for not just {{t|technology}}, but society and even knowledge itself.
{{author|Brian Arthur}}’s treatise is a little ponderous but, all the same, is most encouraging in its [[Epistemology|philosophical]] disposition — assuming as it does the “recursivity” of society and technology, rather than holding the (usual) view that one is strictly a product of the other. This is a [[path-dependent]] model for not just {{t|technology}}, but society and even knowledge itself.


But for some, this is dangerous stuff. It  opens the door to all that crazy post-modern stuff.
But for some, this is dangerous stuff. It  opens the door to all that crazy post-modern stuff.
Line 30: Line 29:
Recognising that the special sauce in technology is, for the time being at least, the bit supplied by the [[meatware]], is a comforting thought.
Recognising that the special sauce in technology is, for the time being at least, the bit supplied by the [[meatware]], is a comforting thought.
{{c|Technology}}
{{c|Technology}}
{{Seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Taxonomy]]
*[[Taxonomy]]