The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|book review|}}{{br|The Peter Principle}}, by Dr. {{author|Laurence J. Peter}} and {{author|Raymond Hull}}
{{a|book review|}}{{br|The Peter Principle}}, by Dr. {{author|Laurence J. Peter}} and {{author|Raymond Hull}}


This classic satire of modern management is, of course, largely correct and but for some rather dated scenarios and value judgments, remains quite relevant to modern management.
This classic satire of modern management is, of course, largely correct and but for some rather dated scenarios and value judgments remains highly relevant to explain the mess of modern [[middle management]].


Two of its central concepts can be dressed in terms a modern millennial might understand: The [[hierarchy]], and the principle itself, that ''in a hierarchy, everyone tends to rises to one’s own level of incompetence''.<ref>I have wokified this a little bit from its 1969 formulation; the key change is that it is not just employees, but anyone in a hierarchy. This is a consequence of the [[agency problem]].</ref>
Re can re-dress two of its central concepts in terms a millennial might understand: the [[hierarchy]], and the Peter Principle itself, that ''in a [[hierarchy]], everyone tends to rises to one’s own level of incompetence''.<ref>I have wokified this a little bit from its 1969 formulation; the key change is that it is not just employees, but anyone in a hierarchy. This is a consequence of the [[agency problem]].</ref>


===[[Hierarchy]]===
===[[Hierarchy]]===
Line 20: Line 20:
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Agency problem]]
*[[Agency problem]]
*[[Power structure]]
*[[Evolution by natural selection]]
*[[Evolution by natural selection]]