The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: Difference between revisions

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (view source)

Revision as of 16:27, 28 December 2018

11 bytes added , 28 December 2018

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,853

edits

Revision as of 15:28, 25 June 2018 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:27, 28 December 2018 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{review\|The Structure of Scientific Revolutions\|Thomas Kuhn\|R1819ZYM41EGVR\|17 January 2007\|Small and perfectly formed: one of the greats of 20th Century Philosophy}}		{{a\|tech\|}}{{review\|The Structure of Scientific Revolutions\|Thomas Kuhn\|R1819ZYM41EGVR\|17 January 2007\|Small and perfectly formed: one of the greats of 20th Century Philosophy}}

	A true classic of Twentieth Century literature, this wonderful little book, which argues for the contingency of scientific knowledge, deserves space on the bookshelf next to {{br\|The Wealth of Nations}} (identifying the [[contingency]] of economic wellbeing and value), Hume’s {{br\|A Treatise of Human Nature}} (causal scepticism), {{br\|The Origin of Species}} (the contingency of biological development) and Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (the contingency of language) - along with those perennially confusing continental stalwarts {{author\|Friedrich Nietzsche}} and {{author\|Ludwig Wittgenstein}}, as representing the fundamental underpinnings of modern Relativist thought.		A true classic of Twentieth Century literature, this wonderful little book, which argues for the contingency of scientific knowledge, deserves space on the bookshelf next to {{br\|The Wealth of Nations}} (identifying the [[contingency]] of economic wellbeing and value), Hume’s {{br\|A Treatise of Human Nature}} (causal scepticism), {{br\|The Origin of Species}} (the contingency of biological development) and Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (the contingency of language) - along with those perennially confusing continental stalwarts {{author\|Friedrich Nietzsche}} and {{author\|Ludwig Wittgenstein}}, as representing the fundamental underpinnings of modern Relativist thought.