The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|book review|[[File:Structure.jpg|450px|center]]}}'''''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions''''' by {{author|Thomas Kuhn}}
{{a|book review|{{image|Structure|jpg|}}}}'''''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions''''' by {{author|Thomas Kuhn}}{{bi}}
===Small and perfectly formed: one of the great works of modern philosophy===
===Small and perfectly formed: one of the great works of modern philosophy===
{{author|Thomas Kuhn}}’s {{br|The Structure of Scientific Revolutions}} is a true classic of modern literature. This wonderful little book, which argues for the contingency of scientific knowledge, deserves space on the bookshelf next to [[Adam Smith]]’s ''The Wealth of Nations'' (identifying the contingency of economic value), [[David Hume]]’s ''A Treatise of Human Nature'' (the contingency of cause), Charles Darwin’s {{br|The Origin of Species}} (the contingency of biology) and Richard Rorty’s ''Contingency, Irony and Solidarity'' (the contingency of language) — along with those perennially confusing continental stalwarts {{author|Friedrich Nietzsche}} and {{author|Ludwig Wittgenstein}} — as representing the fundamental underpinnings of modern pragmatic thought.
{{author|Thomas Kuhn}}’s {{br|The Structure of Scientific Revolutions}} is a true classic of modern literature. This wonderful little book, which argues for the contingency of scientific knowledge, deserves space on the bookshelf next to [[Adam Smith]]’s ''The Wealth of Nations'' (identifying the contingency of economic value), [[David Hume]]’s ''A Treatise of Human Nature'' (the contingency of cause), Charles Darwin’s {{br|The Origin of Species}} (the contingency of biology) and Richard Rorty’s ''Contingency, Irony and Solidarity'' (the contingency of language) — along with those perennially confusing continental stalwarts {{author|Friedrich Nietzsche}} and {{author|Ludwig Wittgenstein}} — as representing the fundamental underpinnings of modern pragmatic thought.
Line 39: Line 39:
{{author|Richard Dawkins}} may not like that sort of accountability but, not being a scientist, I do.
{{author|Richard Dawkins}} may not like that sort of accountability but, not being a scientist, I do.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Paradigm]] for a longer discussion about the relevance of all this in our post-truth world.
*[[Epistemology]]
*[[Epistemology]]
*{{br|No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller}}
*{{br|No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller}}
*{{br|Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race Gender and Identity}}
*{{br|Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race Gender and Identity}}
{{Book Club Wednesday|24/11/20}}