82,903
edits
The dog in the night time: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Hostility''': combative/aggressive demeanour to criticism | *'''Hostility''': combative/aggressive demeanour to criticism | ||
*'''No errors''': no screw ups, no bad launches: everything is fine. Real companies have setbacks. Especially if defended with hostility - e.g., you threaten to ruin EVERYTHING with your questions. | *'''No errors''': no screw ups, no bad launches: everything is fine. Real companies have setbacks. Especially if defended with hostility - e.g., you threaten to ruin EVERYTHING with your questions. | ||
*'''The dog ate my homework''': Promised answers to your questions are delayed, derailed, lost or excused. There's an excuse for everything. The excuses are implausible/out of proportion with the question. (what's the most plausible explanation: The dog really did eat your homework or ---? | |||
*'''Sleepy backwater''': It’s a boring and unglamorous part of the operational network. No one’s taking any risks there: Libor, Kerviel, Abodolo | |||
*'''Weird whistleblowers''': The people who called it out were unglamorous, outsiders, easy to catagorise as cranks | |||
With all the checks and balances in financial regulation, how did: | With all the checks and balances in financial regulation, how did: | ||
| Line 24: | Line 27: | ||
*Dot com bust | *Dot com bust | ||
*CDOs | *CDOs | ||
*Libor | *Libor | ||
===Women in STEM=== | |||
Does regulation work? | Does regulation work? | ||
- Netting | - Netting | ||
- Diversity | - Diversity | ||