Third party: Difference between revisions

Third party (view source)

183 bytes added , 3 December 2022

no edit summary

81,841

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{a|cosmology|}} if we take it it as granted, per the experimental lexa physics of pioneers such as [[J.F.M. Biggs]] that traditional Euclidean geometry does not adequately describe the [[space-tedium continuum]], with its in-folded [[incluso]]s, [[proviso]]s, [[proviso]]s, then we have to consider whether the usual tripartite dimensional structure is appropriate.
+{{a|cosmology|}}If we take it it as granted, per the experimental [[lexophysics]] of pioneers such as [[J.F.M. Biggs]] that traditional Euclidean geometry does not adequately describe the [[space-tedium continuum]], with its in-folded [[incluso]]s, [[proviso]]s, [[proviso]]s, then we have to consider whether the usual three-dimensional model of the legal universe is still fit for purpose.
-A naive view of commerce would say there is the contractual counterparties (“[[Party A]]” and “[[Party B]]” or, for old fashioned finance types, “[[Bank]]” and “[[Borrower]]”) and the remainder of the universe comprising disinterested third parties.
+A naive view of commerce would say there are three “dimensions”: the two contractual counterparties (“[[Party A]]” and “[[Party B]]” or, for old fashioned finance types, “[[Bank]]” and “[[Borrower]]”) and then the remainder of the universe comprising disinterested third parties.
+Tony Blair, of all people, tried to warp the continuum with his ill-fated [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999]]